I am pleased observe eHarmony reacting in their formal blog site to articles named „Marriage-Maker Claims tend to be Tied in Knots ” from Wall Street diary. The WSJ article examines many wedding stats launched by dating sites like eHarmony as well as the strategy accustomed assess these types of data. We spoke some about any of it topic at the same time, a few weeks ago whenever the initial WSJ post had been published (see tale).

The WSJ post don’t look to kindly about stats revealed by dating sites, and also for the many component I agree with the writer. The public needs knowing how these statistics tend to be generated. Of all of the online dating sites discussed in WSJ post, „eHarmony sticks out as among the list of much more careful people”. This isn’t exactly a glowing docuold gay men datingt for eHarmony so, they decided to post a response on their blog site.

Into the eHarmony blog post each goes into additional details on the way they calculated that their particular dating site had been in charge of 2% of marriages in the United States, through the 12-month duration ending March 2007. Most of the details we currently realized about from a previously released PDF document called „eHarmony | Harris involved 2007 wedding Metrics Number of eHarmony Marriages” (see Story), however the article does eliminate some more details. Just what this blog blog post really does show is, eHarmony is wanting to-be as available and transparent with their investigation findings possible. I believe title „Open correspondence” may undoubtedly be your best option for your formal eHarmony blog.

Here is the complete eHarmony response to the Wall Street diary how they determine their unique wedding statistics. For further information about this dating site, browse our article on eHarmony.